The next big thing?

The following was excerpted from a New York Times article posted on a friend's FB page, and titled "Next Big Thing in English: Knowing You Know That They Know", by Patricia Cohen. In my last response, I wondered about the current state of affairs regarding critical theory. I found the article interesting from that perspective, and also because I'm truly fascinated by science. I've pasted the link at the end of the excerpt if your interest is also piqued.



At a time when university literature departments are confronting painful budget cuts, a moribund job market and pointed scrutiny about the purpose and value of an education in the humanities, the cross-pollination of English and psychology is a providing a revitalizing lift.

Jonathan Gottschall, who has written extensively about using evolutionary theory to explain fiction, said “it’s a new moment of hope” in an era when everyone is talking about “the death of the humanities.” To Mr. Gottschall a scientific approach can rescue literature departments from the malaise that has embraced them over the last decade and a half. Zealous enthusiasm for the politically charged and frequently arcane theories that energized departments in the 1970s, ’80s and early ’90s — Marxism, structuralism, psychoanalysis — has faded. Since then a new generation of scholars have been casting about for The Next Big Thing.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/books/01lit.html?pagewanted=1